Date: 25 Nov 1998 23:03:54 GMT From: "CoD" <conor_daly_DELETE_ME_nopsamail.com> Subject: Re: weight to HP ratio for 900 vs 9000
Edmund Blackadder <israelssonnopsamnet.se> wrote in article <r8j52.6158$f4.14740nopsamserver.swip.net>... > > C. Daly skrev i meddelandet <01be142e$d1333dc0$4adf7ac0nopsam.met.ie>... > > > > > >_ <yournamenopsam.com> wrote in article <6tcikh$l93$1nopsam1.sirius.com>... > > > >> So this would seem to calculate out 21 for a 900 and 22 for a 9000. > >Molusks > >> neverless. I was hoping to upgrade my old 1986-900 but may just keep the > > > >> old slug after all. > >> > > > >Upgrade to a nice '90 something < '93 900 S or turbo. That'll keep you > >happy! Who wants a 9000 anyway?-) > > > >Conor Daly > > Everyone that considder handling as well as power. > /Edmund > > Naaah! CoD
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
