Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 06:18:35 GMT From: bigredbearnopsamforest.com (D J Mann) Subject: Re: SAAB 9-5 or Charysler 300M ?
In article <7ac96o$ff0$1nopsamurst.ccs.yorku.ca>, morrnopsamu.caREMOVE TO REPLY wrote: >In its heyday Chryser was a prestigeous nameplate, but, after two decades of >crap, they are just starting to rebuild their reputation. Saab is quite a >prestigeous, if somewhat oddball name. I have never been criticized by anyone >about my decision to buy a Saab, and anyone who has been in the car has been >impressed by it....so far. Maybe its just a persoanl view that bears no merit, >but I don't think so. Saab had their years too, with ring-ding motors, then some piece of trash built by Triumph for them (SAAB 99), and also the Ford Taunus (German) V4 of all things... -------------------------------------------- David Mann jacobus shift-two value period net When you're having a bad day and it seems like people are trying your patience, remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown, and only 4 to pull the trigger of a decent sniper rifle. --------------------------------------------
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
