Date: 16 Feb 1999 19:19:15 GMT
From: fenechnopsamO".com
Subject: Re: SAAB 9-5 or Charysler 300M ?

I agree, the 300M, as far as I'm concerned, was doomed from the beginning as far as its styling becoming old, since it was preceeded by several similar styled Chrysler/Dodge models in the Mid-1990's. ie. Cirrus, Concorde, LHS, Intrepid, Sebring etc....don't get me wrong though, I think it's a classy/sporty vehicle and there is a significant market out there for them. I just wouldn't replace my 9-5 with one! In <7ac96o$ff0$>, morrnopsamu.caS* (Mark Orr) writes: >In its heyday Chryser was a prestigeous nameplate, but, after two decades of >crap, they are just starting to rebuild their reputation. Saab is quite a >prestigeous, if somewhat oddball name. I have never been criticized by anyone >about my decision to buy a Saab, and anyone who has been in the car has been >impressed by far. Maybe its just a persoanl view that bears no merit, >but I don't think so. > >Mark > Later, Pablo Replace "IGMO" with

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network -
For usage guidelines, see the Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | on Facebook | on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]