Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:06:35 GMT From: r600nopsamejanews.com Subject: Re: SAAB 9-5 or Charysler 300M ?
No, I haven't read Consumer Reports yet. The 9-3 is too unconventional for them, but I love it. I think I would like driving a 3-series or A4, but you can't carry anything in those cars. Plus, I like the feel of 100% of turbo torque kicking in all at once -- it may be immature, but it's fun! My point about R&T and other car mags is just that they are all so inconsistent, and I think it's irreseponsible on their part. As a consumer, I can't depend on accurate info from them; I think it's kind of reckless on their part. In article <7aegrl$r3f$1nopsamy.cc.emory.edu>, lparkernopsamy.edu (Lloyd R. Parker) wrote: > r600nopsamejanews.com wrote: > : Lloyd, my message below was in response to another message about Saab, not > : about this ongoing 300M vs 9-5 comparison... > : > : But as usual, you've added a bunch of bone-head comments. The magazine's are > : full of shit. Car and Driver ranks the S70 above the 9-5. Then last month, > : C&D's sister publication, R&T, ranks the 9-3 above the S70 (which came in last > : out of six), the MB C280, etc... The 9-5 is a better car than the 9-3, period. > : So, what gives? It's all personal choice. You prefer the styling and value of > : the 300M, I prefer the individuality and innovation of Saab. > > Doesn't R&T do two rankings -- one independent of price and one dependent > on it? > > Have you read the Consumer Reports tests? They like the 9-5 quite a bit, > but do not like the 9-3 at all. > > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
