Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:05:41 -0700 From: Tom Phillips <tphillipnopsamam.employersresource.com> Subject: Re: Did Ford screw up the 1994+ 900?
I have a 1994 900S with a V6 with 82K miles on it and have had only one problem with it. I had a bad right front wheel bearing $300 at 71K. That is the only non-wear or non-normal maintenance problem I have had with the car. I have replaced the rear shocks, because the left one was leaking. I love the car. I have seen a lot of "bad" reports on this NG about the 94 and 95, specifically the V6. However, I had had NO problems with the V6 and know 2 people (94 900S and 95 900SE) with V4's who have had problems with thier V4's. Also, I have not seen one specific reason, "so and so is bad", "___ fails early", etc to not buy a 1994 V6. And no one on this newsgroup has ever been able to show me anything to backup their stories. Milton Yarberry wrote: > > I was looking at 4 cyl, turbo, non-convertable S or SE. > > do you have any idea what the most common problems > are? (transmission, electrical, body, interior?) > > Thanks, > > Milt > > PS Did you see the other replys to my post? Not quite the > concensus builder that I hoped that it would be. > > Johan LAUWERS wrote: > > > First of all it wasn't Ford but GM. > > > > Secondly if you have a 900 from 1995 on then you could have a good one. > > Please some more specifications (V6 or not,...) > > > > Johan > > 83 900 GLi > > 94 9000 CS > > 94 9000 CSE
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
