Date: 6 Apr 1999 13:45:43 GMT From: homepaulnopsamcom (HomePaul) Subject: Re: Comparison
Michael, Each of the cars has its own appeal, but I'd go with the '95 over the '91. Here's my two cents' worth: The '91 admittedly is a classic shape, although it's NOT a true SPG--more likely it's one with the body panels... SPGs were not available in convertible form, so it's likely rated at the 'standard' turbo power level. Spare parts might be a tad more available, and some would argue that the early cars handle better than the later ones (struts versus control arms up front). The 95 is quicker, the transmissions are MUCH sturdier, many of the systems are better-designed and last longer (A/C is an example) the fit and finish of the car is much better than the earlier ones, and there might be a slim chance of having some warranty left on it. Paul
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
