Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:07:17 GMT From: kr4nopsamnyu.edu (Kalman Rubinson) Subject: Re: 9-3 vs 9-5
Chuck Millirons (chuckmillironsnopsamspring.com) wrote: > if what you really want is the combination of both (sporty 9-3 with the > versatility of the hatch and the luxury and cockpit room of the 9-5) then > your decision is simple! Find a very low mileage 1997 9000 Aero or 1998 > 9000CSE and go for it!!! No better combination and quite a bargin (expect > mid to high 20's for under 15K miles!) Now, if the 9-5 was a hatchback, I would consider it but we turn over (!) our cars every three years since service is such a hassle in NYC. Minimum contact with dealers and service is essential. Kal
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
