Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:29:40 +0000 From: johnnopsamAMgriffinphoto.u-net.com (John) Subject: Re: Classic900s - 8v vs 16v performance results
Dear Alan, I would agree that the 8v's are quicker off the mark than the 16v - I have owned both. I was very disapointed with the apparent performance of my present T16 when I test drove it 3years ago. I had previously re built an 8v engine and added a gear box from a T16 (it also had an APC box from a 16v) and it went like a rocket of the line. However I did notice that it ran out of steam above 4000rpm where as the T16 just kept getting faster right up to the red line - and made much less fuss about it. The great thing about the T16 is its smoothness you can think you are not going any and look at you speedo and its pushing on over 90 without any feeling of effort from the engine. The best fun I had in a Saab was when I borrowed a 79 99turbo for month when my T16 was off the road. It had a real feeling of driver involvement and as the turbo wound up it just wanted to go faster and faster - I nearly traded in my T16. When I came to get my T16 back I realised how much less effort you needed to go anywhere. The 99 was fun but I could not live with it as everyday transport. I would always go for the T16 over the T8 for the following reasons; The head is stronger - the 8v is prone to cracks, It has cruise control - essential !, The taller gearing, LH fuel system and higher compression make it more economical - I get 38mpg at 70mph and lastly I just prefer the more even power delivery (boy racers would disagree). I don't like the front anti roll bar though - I've just removed mine and got rid of the understeer and now know where I'm going when cornering - feels like a Saab 99 (nearly!) John