Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:45:50 -0800 From: "John R. Weiss" <jrweissnopsamlobal*nospam*.net> Subject: Re: used '96 vs '98 900's
The normally-aspirated engine will be a dog compared with the Turbo. There is still a warranty in effect for the '98, too. Go for the new one! --------------------- John R. Weiss Lake Forest Park, WA www.tsca.net/puget/ > > Anand Modi <delockenopsamdnet.att.net> wrote in message > > news:38C6FE1C.263563EBnopsamdnet.att.net... > > > 1996 900S, ~37K miles, off a 48 month lease. 5 speed: $16,500, auto > > > $16,900 > > > 1998 900SE Turbo (w/ leather and the like), ~28K miles, off a 24 month > > > lease, includes 4 snow tires on rims in addition to normal street tires, > > > $21,000 > > > > > > which is a better deal? is there a substantial difference between the > > > turbo and the normally aspirated engines? are there any mechanical > > > issues inherent to either model that i should take into consideration? > > > thanks
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
