Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:50:18 GMT From: hootspanopsamp.org Subject: Re: I own 1 of each
Thanks. When you say watch out for the auto tranny is their any test you can do to tell if there is a problem with it? Are the V6's coupled to a GM auto tranny? In article <38d7e543.26912693nopsam.netway.com>, jtmav wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:52:23 GMT, hootspanopsamp.org wrote: > > I own a 94 9000 CSE T (125k) and a 00 9-5 Aero with 1300 miles. I am > the original owner of the 9k and took great care with her and she has > given my family good service. The 9-5 Aero is a remarkable car. Much > more refined than my 9k. Faster and the suspension is extraordinary. > Soft in the straightaways and tight in the twisties. Acceleration is > superb. Everything about the Aero is quality and well engineered. > Personally I love the full pressure turbos that is why I own both of > these vehicles. As far as the difference, it depends which 9-5 you are > comparing the 2.3 4banger or the 3.0 6. Personally I would only get > the 4, its a proven Saab engine and with care will give you years of > service. Check the service records and make sure the car was > maintained properly. Watch out for heater cores, head gaskets, DI > cassettes and motor mounts. All problematic with the 9ks. Also auto > trannys can be tricky. Good luck . > > JTMav > > 94 9000 CSE T 125k > 00 9-5 Aero 1300 miles > > >I'm interested in buying a late model 9000. Anyone know what the > >differences are between the last 9000 and the 9-5? For some reason > >Consumer Reports recommends the 9-5 but doesn't have anything on the > >9000? > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Ask those who > >Ask those who > >.......... > >......... > > > > > >Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > >Before you buy. > > JTMav > Remove the NSP for email > -- Ask those who Ask those who .......... ......... Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
