Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 20:03:08 -0000 From: "darran.hill" <dazmorgnopsamo> Subject: Re: Air con
I only have standard A/C not climate control, I know the difference between them but does it make a difference? Darran "Andersson, Patrik" <p.a1nopsama.com> wrote in message news:TnDR5.6494$jv2.804210nopsamc.telia.net... > I im certain that it is NO danger to keep the AC on at all the time. i > assume that you have climate control and not an ordinary stand alone AC. I > hope i helped. > "darran.hill" <dazmorgnopsamo> skrev i meddelandet > news:vREQ5.1686$X03.34881nopsam2-win.server.ntlworld.com... > > Can anyone come up with a definitive answer with regard to Aircon being > left > > on all the time, I've read in several places now that it should be, this > > doesn't seem right to me especially as it cuts out in low temperatures, > I've > > also read that it shouldn't. I'm not too bothered about the fuel economy > as > > I don't think it equates to much anyway, (apparently the same as leaving a > > window open) but what is everyones thoughts to leaving it on? > > > > By the way I have a 1996 900XS not a bad car, my best to date, but it has > a > > few niggly faults and at 83000 is starting to develop some creaks and > buzzes > > which I rather hoped a prestige car wouldn't. > > > > Cheers, > > Darran > > > > > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
