Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:46:21 GMT From: selkie9nopsamlessyahoo.com Subject: Re: 1994 Saab 900S - to buy or not to buy?
Errm ...hi. We've just signed the papers on a 94 Saab 900s, with the V6 in it. In our ignorance (I really should have done this a few days ago), we thought it looked and drove pretty well, and despite knowing that both the engine and the transmission have recently been replaced, went ahead, figuring that the two most expensive things had already busted once, and so were less likely to come up too soon. Wrong idea? How rotten are the V6's and what tends to happen? (Feel free to email me if this isn't that interesting to other posters, I just wandered in here tonight.) Selkie *My apologies if this post appears twice, I posted the damn thing without a spamcatcher the first time* On 25 May 2001 21:22:15 -0700, sosbcnopsam.saabnet.com (Saabster) wrote: >"Radek" <radeknopsamr.ca> wrote in message news:<dp_O6.188$rD3.45099nopsam.total.net>... >> I will be looking at a 900S, year 1994.... Should this model >> year be avoided altogether? > >Not necessarily. Just stay far, far away from the Opel-built V6s. As >long as it's a turbo 4 you'll be fine. As with any car, test drive it >and confirm its overall condition. Also try to determine its service >history and whether or not its been properly maintained. The cool >thing about the NG900s is that you can fit Viggen body parts on them >to make them look sportier. > >Saabster >85 900 8v
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
