 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 12:28:12 +0100 From: Baz <baznopsamn.co.uk> Subject: Re: Help me decide! 900S Hatchback vs. 900SE Convertible
On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 18:17:20 -0400, Four Weis <mweinopsamcom> wrote: > > >Janet & Ian Murray wrote: > >> 1997 S has 39,000 miles, 1995 SE has 75,000 miles. Similarly priced and >> optioned (except SE-only stuff). In similar condition, Blue Book rates the >> SE a better buy by $2500 US. >> >> Your choice? >> >> Any opinions on the SE's V6 versus the S's I4 (I commute 500 miles/week). > >Unless things have changed I would avoid V6 and stick with 4 cylinder. I hear alot about avoiding the V6, but as yet no-one has given any reason why ? It needs it's timing belt changed every 30,000 miles seems to be the only complaint, but it's hardly a problem, it costs about 100 UKP ? Regards Jay
|
|
|
|
|