 |
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 2001 20:30:38 -0400 From: tednopsamack.accurev.com (Ted Ede) Subject: Re: Need an opinion between 9000 CSE 2.3 t (170) & 2.3 Turbo (200)
In article <9pldaj$pqp$1nopsamdoo.fr>, Marc Delporte <marc.delportenopsamdoo.fr> wrote: >The motor being the same ie 2.3 (9000 CSE) > >does somebody has an opinion (+ & -) between the 2 turbos ? > >t 170 (turbo low power) >T 200 (the original ?) > >Thanks I have a CS (t) and my wife has the CSE (T), both 1997. The extra 30 HP is noticeable. For creeping and beeping into Boston every morning it doesn't make much difference to me. However, when the wife lets me drive hers, I always get a sh*t eating grin on my face when I step on it. the 2.3t is no slouch, it's just not as fun. ted
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
