Date: 21 Nov 2001 14:39:18 GMT
From: jmel5nopsamcomnospam (JMEL5)
Subject: Re: Purchasing a Saab


> >Wrong assumption. Jaguar had one of the worst quality records in the >biz. Ford was able to improve on that. In contrast, GM has a lousy >reputation for quality, reliability, and customer service. The more >of that Saab avoids, the better. > >JB Well, GM doesn't have the top-rated cars for reliability, but, they certainly had a better reputation than Saab in regard to reliability in the States. It wasn't until recently that Saab has started to pull themselves out of that slump and shake off the image that their cars are "great to drive when they work". As I said, the data shows that every car manufacturer has increased reliability and quality since the 70's and 80's, it's good to see Saab making improvements, too. I can't speak about GM dealer service since I never had any car serviced there. All of the GM's I owned were decent cars, nothing to be passionate about, but reliable cars given their age by the time I got them. JJ

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]