Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:26:09 -0000 From: "Ian W" <ian.worleynopsamorld.com> Subject: Re: Performance of 9-5 2.0t question
Cheers Murphwiz. Do you have any tips of what to look for as far as faults for a '98 9-5 2.3SE with about 80k on the clock? Ian. "Murphwiz" <murphwiznopsamail.comTAKEMEOUT> wrote in message news:a4p7um$opn$1nopsamsos.btinternet.com... > > "Ian W" <ian.worleynopsamorld.com> wrote in message > news:U0Ub8.96565$H37.12675095nopsam2-win.server.ntlworld.com... > > Dear All, > > > > Like a lot of newcomers to Saabs, I am looking for a quality car with good > > reliability that suits my pocket. The latter is where the rub begins, > which > > is a paltry £7,000. My first choice is the 9-5 2.3t auto, but from having > a > > quick peek around the market, its not going to happen. > > > > Does anybody have the answers to these questions? > > > > I was thinking about a 9-5 2.0t and I was wondering if its performance is > > good for safe overtaking? > > What about an auto box on a 2.0t? > > When the miles roll past 100k miles and 120k miles, will the engine > require > > some attention? (My pug ran out of steam at 100k) > > > > Thanks in advance for the information, > > > > Ian > > (Hopefully a Saab devotee soon!) > > > > > > Only paid £9k for my 99 9-5 2.3 auto, with options... keep looking, they are > out there somewhere > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
