 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:04:52 -0000 From: "Lineone" <adriannopsamone.org> Subject: Re: 9000 vs. 9-5
For me the big difference is the Independent Rear Suspension (IRS) on the 9-5 vs. live rear axle on the 9K. With IRS, cornering is at least theoretically better - and this is borne out by many reports. If I could convert my 9K to IRS at a reasonable price I would. (This is purely academic as nobody offer a kit - unless someone knows different!) I would love to go round corners like other cars - without lurching and rolling all over the place. Apart from that the 9K is a super car. And then there's the Hatch vs. Estate (aka "Wagon" for some reason) issue..... Adrian 1992 9000 CS 2.3-16i (rare non turbo) "Kyclist" <kyclistnopsamme.rr.com> wrote in message news:3CQe8.137529$dh.36792711nopsamoon.nyroc.rr.com... > Does anyone have any opinions on the 9000 vs. the 9-5? Specifically an Aero > vs. a 9-5SE 5pd. I know the performance of the Aero, which is why I am > interested, and of course there is the hatchback. Any other pros or cons > either way? Thanks. > >
|
|
|
|
|