Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 17:48:16 -0500 From: Kalman Rubinson <kr4nopsamedu> Subject: Re: New "used" 93 puchase
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002 22:29:06 GMT, Bob <uctraingNOSPAMnopsamanet.com> wrote: >On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:05:30 -0500, Kalman Rubinson <kr4nopsamedu> >wrote: > > >>I had a '96 900SE and a '99 9-3SE (both on 3 year leases) and I >>definitely suggest the 9-3. The suspension improvements alone justify >>it. > >For the difference in $'s you could put some money into the 900 >suspension and have a car better than either is stock. Agreed, depending on one's disposition. >> The only downside to my particular 9-3 is that HUGE remote fob >>for the key. > >I think the updated "key with fob" can be programmed for a '99 9-3 >to eliminate the elephant fob. I know that the NG900 can't. Considering that my lease is up in July, now is not the time for an investment in a new "key with fob." Besides, I hate to pay $$$ for the stupidity of Saab's decision on this but I will insist on a better key with my next car, Saab or not. Kal
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
