Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:10:52 GMT From: "Spyderman" <spydermannopsamofyourbusiness.com> Subject: Re: Abbott, Hirsch, or ???
Dave, I too have been having this "great dilemma". I am very concerned about my car's engine warranty and also the relationships my manufacturer takes on. It seems that Saab has struck up a relationship with Hirsch and although the HP's are somewhat less, I believe they may be less intrusive with no replacement wastegate. Everyone that I have seen feedback on swears by Hirsch as they take on a more conservative and structured approach to these mods, unlike Abbott that seems to have a "balls to the wall" approach. This is my opinion so please don't get all loopy on me. Hirsh provide various stages of upgrades whereas I find the Abbott boys more racing savvy. I guess in the end it depends what you really want, "good grammar or good taste"... FYI, Hirsch are definitely more expensive. Spyderman <davehinznopsamcop.net> wrote in message news:a9n4ve$4mksp$1nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de... > I'll be buying a 9-3 or 9-5 in the next couple of weeks, and want to > replace the stock ECM with something a bit more, er, enthusiastic. > I just had a great conversation with Dave from Abbott America, and would > be most interested in feedback regarding their products, vs the others > who are out there that I may not be aware of. > > In other words, is Abbott's $830.00 box, that gives +35 horsepower, > the best bang for the buck? How's the drivability (US Spec car, which > probably matters). > > Thanks, > Dave Hinz
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
