The above is an advertisment. If it asks you to download software or create an account, please ignore it.
Site News - 11/25: Special Ad Rate | 11/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads!
Date: 23 May 2002 10:54:08 -0700
From: mischievous1nopsamail.com (JD)
Subject: Re: 95 vs. 96 Saab 900


Thanks guys. In what year did they change the tail-lights? Are there any late model 95's whose tail-lights have the look of the 96/97+ ?? -jason > Someone who looks an awful lot like JD <mischievous1nopsamail.com> wrote: > > This is my first post to this group. > > Welcome; we're mostly friendly, and usually won't bite (much). > > (snip) > > I understand that Saab dropped the 6 cyl, > > which begs the question: which is better, 4 or 6 cyl? > > Well...the 4 is a solid design with timing chains, the 6 is a GM > design with timing belts, lower power per cubic inch, and more > moving parts to go wrong. A friend of mine who is a Saab master mechanic > won't consider buying the 6... > > Not saying the 6 is crap, but it's not anywhere near the engine the 4 > is, and was more of a marketing solution than a technical one. > > > > Dave > > > --

Return to Main Index
StateOfNine.com
SaabClub.com
Jak Stoll Performance
M Car Covers
Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2026 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]