Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:18:19 -0400 From: KeithG <noonenopsamspring.com> Subject: Re: Saab advice
Dave, I agree, somewhat, with the poster. The new 9^3 is quite 'same' to me. I was not too enamored of the NG900/C9^3 either. I like that the 9X and 9^3X have a personality to them. I just hope that I do not have to get an awd, raised vehicle just to get a Saab hatch. I like the 5 dr (unlike most Americans based on sales volume, anyway) and will miss it. KeithG davehinznopsamcop.net wrote: > Someone who looks an awful lot like Guava Baby <guavababynopsamspring.com> wrote: > >>Trond-Arve Hjelle wrote: > > >>>http://home.no.net/tahjelle/nye9-3 for pictures. >> > >>Yuck! Apparently, I'm going to have to go to rather extreme lengths to maintain >>my 1990 900S, because Saab doesn't make attractive cars any more. Bah. > > > Wow, you're joking, right? The 9000, now when that came out, it was > *YUK*, but got better over time. The whole 9-x thing is *disturbingly* > ugly. But, the new 9-3 seems to me to be somewhere between the 9-5 > and the 900 Classic. > > I wonder if those wheels will fit on my 9-5... > > Dave Hinz >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
