Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:08:23 -0400, noonenopsamspring.com suggested: : 17 MPG!??! in a 2.0LT(t) something is wrong. It could be as simple as an : air filter. Both mine get 25 in town and 30 on the road. one is a 2.0T : (1992 C900) and the other is a 2.3T (1995 9k). 17 sounds more like a v6 : than a L4T. The longer it goes like this, the higher the chance of : engine damage, though. Did you verify this value by measuring : consumption for 2 fills? Reliance on the SID is not suggested as it CAN : be wrong. I've been wondering about fuel consumption myself. I have a 1995 2.3na 900 S, and I get scarcely better than 20 mpg between tanks. Could a faulty catalytic converter have this kind of an effect? I noticed a "rotten eggs" sulfury smell a couple times when I first got the car, but not since then. I've owned the car about 9 months now. -- agreenbu Return to Main Index
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
