Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:27:01 +0000 From: Paul Halliday <pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: GM 900 Vs. Classic 900
in article atd1v2$12cbju$1nopsam52899.news.dfncis.de, Grunff at grunffnopsam.com wrote on 13/12/2002 16:28: > Henrik B. wrote: > >> Why always all this bullocks? When have Saab buils their own car - which >> model? You cannot mention ONE Saab, without it having "fingerprints" from >> other carmanf. all over....! Erm, the 93 ... 96 ... ? > Henrik, the simple fact is most people (not all, *most* - maybe > 80%, maybe more) who have experience with both the C900 and the > NG900 prefer the former, especially if they work on their own cars. Dot ... Dot ... Dot ... NG Saab = (Oh God) <b>N</b>ot <b>G</b>M :) > This may be because it's a better car (which is my view), or it > may be because it's just that little bit quirkier and more > interesting. It's just a better car .... "period" (to use a phrase from our US friends). Paul 1985 900i 16V 1989 900 Turbo S http://pjgh.go.dyndns.org/saab/index.html