Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 02:15:07 GMT From: "Spyderman" <buzzoffnopsamfyourbusiness.com> Subject: Re: 5 year old Saab with 50.000 km
I would imagine that much service had also been done on the 98 MY. Can you get the records from both vehicles? My initial response would be to go for the lower mileage vehicle. I know that a major brakejob is required at 40K according to my dealer for my 9-3 2001MY and I'm sure that the higher mileage vehicle must've had some good maintenance work done to it also but I would prefer the less K's. Let us know please. "P R" <pierrerahmenopsamrs.com> wrote in message news:pxIW9.118748$pDv.56154nopsam04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > You're amazing !! > "Cor de Vries" <vriesnopsamll.nl> wrote in message > news:3e2ad840$0$49103$e4fe514cnopsam.xs4all.nl... > > Who can advice me on the following. I am looking for a secondhand Saab 93. > > I can choose between a 1998 Saab 93 with only 50.000 km on the meter or a > 16 > > month newer 1999 Saab 93 with 150.000 km on the meter for the same price. > > What is wise? > > Can I expect to pay more repair costs due to the 100.000 more km's or can > I > > expect more costs on the the first car because its 14 months older. > > > > > > > > > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
