Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:22:49 -0000
From: "jj" <chnopsamail.com>
Subject: Re: 900i advise...


"Paul Halliday" <pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:BA8D7D82.4204%pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk... > in article MPG.18d1dbf610090a2c989859nopsam.cis.dfn.de, MeatballTurbo at > carl.robsonnopsamcing-czechs.com wrote on 06/03/2003 22:28: > What would be the downside? A failed rack in 10,000 miles? Purists may say > different, but I don't think it matters - not on an old Swedish Brick > anyway. I'll stick with Castrol TQ-F - my racks haven't failed yet :) The rack is pure saginaw GM, identical to the racks used in 80's US J body cars... I'm pretty sure any PAS fluid/ATF compatible with GM specs would be OK. Early racks went to lunch no matter what you put in them every 80-100K, the 90> racks were much better.

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]