Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:57:01 -0500 From: "Kenneth S." <nimrodnopsams.com> Subject: Re: Saab 9-3 hatchback - if & when?
Yeah, that's the one I was thinking of, Walt. (I remembered the Mercury version, the Colony Park, which was indeed about the size of one of the smaller British colonies, but in my earlier posting I had forgotten the Country Squire moniker.) At all events, I admit it .. your friend's station wagon was bigger than MY station wagon. Walt Kienzle wrote: > > Ken, > > You have a point, but everything is relative. That was then, this is now. > The wagon is big compared to the sedan and it is very big compared to my > 9000. > > A friend of mine had a Country Squire wagon that had your Gran Torino beat > for size (probably the larger station wagon you were thinking of). Luckily > it had a hood ornament so that it could be aimed properly when driving down > the road. > > BTW, in the mid '70s (actually the late '70s) I drove an AMC Javelin. As > large at that was, I believe it was smaller than the 9-5 station wagon. At > least it seemed smaller on the inside ;-). > > Walt > > "Kenneth S." <nimrodnopsams.com> wrote in message > news:3E729725.17D3nopsams.com... > > Walt: > > > > You call a 9-5 station wagon "huge"? I recently looked at some old > > photos that included the Ford Gran Torino station wagon that I used to > > drive in the mid-70s. Now, THAT's huge. It came with a 400 cubic inch > > (about 6.5 liter) engine. And there was an even bigger station wagon in > > the Ford range in those days. > > > > > > > > > > > > Walt Kienzle wrote: > > > > > > Ken, > > > > > > I agree with everything you say (except I haven't found the 4 door > > > hatchbacks from Mazda or Toyota on their US websites yet). > > > > > > The problem is that 1) I have been told "We have the 9-5 wagon; that's > > > _better_ than a hatchback." Assuming that I would immediately > understand > > > why or how a huge wagon is better than a hatchback. 2) European > > > manufacturers like Mercedes and BMW don't make hatchbacks (please ignore > the > > > discontinued 318ti and the new C230 coupe because they are 2 door > models). > > > > > > > Why on earth would Saab drop one of its distinguishing features in > this > > > > market, and become yet another entry-level luxury vehicle (and one > that, > > > > unlike its competitors in the U.S., has a four, rather than a > > > > six-cylinder, engine)? It just makes no sense to me. > > > > > > That sums it up perfectly. I see Saab's current product line as the > best > > > way to make them an "also ran" among the vast lineup of models > available. > > > The only thing they have going for them is their turbo technology, and > that > > > may be a negative for many people that remember the unreliable turbo > powered > > > cars from Chrysler when they put small engines in big cars. > > > > > > Walt Kienzle > > > 1991 9000T > > > > > > "Kenneth S." <nimrodnopsams.com> wrote in message > > > news:3E71E905.391Bnopsams.com... > > > > Tara Murphy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I don't believe there is any plan to make a hatchback version for > the > > > new > > > > > 9-3. > > > > > > > > > > "Ric" <spamnopsamcom> wrote in message > > > > > news:b4sca7$ahl$1nopsam-reader11.wanadoo.fr... > > > > > > Is there going to be a hatchback version of the new 9-3? If so, > when > > > in > > > > > > Europe? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have to say that I simply don't understand the logic behind this > > > > situation, particularly for the U.S. market. I bought my 1996 900 SE, > > > > partly because I'd always been interested in Saabs, but also partly > > > > because quite a few years of renting hatchbacks during visits to > Europe > > > > had convinced me that this was what I wanted to drive in the U.S. > > > > > > > > Although hatchbacks are very common in Europe, the Saab is almost the > > > > only four-door hatchback on the U.S. market, particularly two years > ago, > > > > when I bought mine. Recently, however, such vehicles seem to be > making > > > > a comeback in the U.S., with Mazda and Toyota versions being > available. > > > > > > > > Why on earth would Saab drop one of its distinguishing features in > this > > > > market, and become yet another entry-level luxury vehicle (and one > that, > > > > unlike its competitors in the U.S., has a four, rather than a > > > > six-cylinder, engine)? It just makes no sense to me.