Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:18:23 GMT From: Paul Halliday <pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: What to call the "new" 9-3 ?
in article b5savr$2d0ffn$2nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de, davehinznopsamcop.net at davehinznopsamcop.net wrote on 26/03/2003 13:46: > Someone who looks an awful lot like Colc <colcnopsampenet.com.au> wrote: >> Hi, > >> what about 93MG or 93M for Millennium.............. justa thought > > Is there a reason we can't call the new 9-3 the "new 9-3"? The > name "new 900", after all, clearly enough tells everyone which car > we're talking about... > > Just stating the obvious, perhaps? 'nuther Bob did actually use this term ("now we have a new 9-3 and an old 9-3") to distinguish and since we all knew what he was talking about I think you've cracked it, Sir. All the brains in Cambridge failed to spot that one :) "New 9-3" it is ... Again ... Still ... Paul <---- Thinking: So, erm, what will we call the current "New 9-3" when the next model revision comes out? "The not as old as the old 9-3", perhaps?
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
