Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:16:56 +0100 From: "jj" <chnopsamail.com> Subject: Re: NG vs. classic
"Dima" <dimanopsamamtdasystems.com> wrote in message news:v9bo6scm0jq629nopsam.supernews.com... > Hello, > > I just got a 1991 900, red, 2.0L, non-turbo. I previously owned a 1997 > 900SE, which was totaled. Comparing the two cars, I can say something that > many of you already know: NG900, in particularly the turbo, is an awfully > nice car, has the comforts and the performance - but not the true Saab > panache. The classic that I just got lacks some of the comforts of the > NG900, but there is smells Saabish through and through! > > The classic 900 is perhaps one of the most interesting mass-produced cars of > the 80's and 90's. I will probably still buy the new Saabs as a nice > comfortable appliance to go to work, go skiing and backpacking. But for fun, > I will stick with the old cars. Yep, the C900 is definately the best.. I recentlydrove a 1995 900 Turbo SE, all the toys, very fast, but handling was poor and I found it very twitchy at speed, not a relaxing drive... I suspect a 9-3 would be a better bet.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
