Date: 4 May 2003 17:34:21 +0200 From: HUW <huw403nopsams.com> Subject: Re: Saab 9-3 radio antenna
davehinznopsamcop.net wrote in news:b92vg6$evcv5$3nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de: > Someone who looks an awful lot like nospam <nowherenopsamhstation.net> > wrote: > >> <davehinznopsamcop.net> wrote in message >> news:b90rtt$dbh4v$2nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de... > >>> Hm, my 9-5 doesn't seem to share the problem, maybe they're making >> progress >>> after all. > >>> Would you be as critical, by the way, if you were using your name? > >> Would the shitty antenna improved itself had I used my name? Methinks >> not. > > My points, both of which you missed, are that now the antenna is built > into the glass, and the issue has therefore been solved; also that > it's notable that you're choosing to participate in a way that > isn't all that friendly. > > I didn't even bring up the "sheesh - go buy a sense of perspective" > point, but someone else has covered that adequately. > > What's next, complaints about the key location, or the fact that > they've stopped offering Toreador Red as a paint option? I mean, > the last I could actually be interested in a discussion of... > the antenna thing is "Yeah, every 5-10 years, you might need to > drop 20 bucks on a new one. Do the math." > > Dave Hinz > > The reason why I was posting my message is: Saab is charging 300 swissfrancs (around 200 USD) for a spare part which costs around 100 swissfrancs in an electronic shop. I'm chemist, not engineer, and would like to learn if somebody knows if there are some barrieres with special connectors or similar things which need to be taken into consideration. Thanks and regards HUW
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
