Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:05:40 +0100 From: MeatballTurbo <carl.robsonnopsamcing-czechs.com> Subject: Re: Two dismantling questions
In article <3EF05243.2070007nopsamspring.com>, noonenopsamspring.com spouted forth into alt.autos.saab... > I do not know for sure about other market cars, but late model C900s > here in the US, have a different knee bolster. It is deeper (towards the > floor) and the removal of the cubby is more difficult. I had an '89 w/o > passive belts and it was like the old style: Remove the screws and it > just moves easily out of the way. I have a '92 now and it requires a bit > of thought and purposeful twisting to remove it and not break off a > tang. YMMV > Yep, apart from the front handbrake, I keep thinking that is a lot of advantages to the older cars. Just wish I could get cruise to work. Under the dash, the chanin is intact, and pulling on it raises revs. Down by the cruise gear in the wing, sucking on a vac hose causes revs to rise. When I put it into cruise, and hit the set button I hear a very solid click from arround the cruise chain under the dash, over the space of a few seconds, it gradually falls several miles an out, and continues doing this until I get back on the gas, before I stop. -- Carl Robson (The poster formerly known as Skodapilot) http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
