Date: 10 Sep 2003 21:09:33 GMT From: Dave Hinz <davehinznopsamcop.net> Subject: Re: Tire Complaint
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:30:10 GMT, milt brewster <milt73nopsamc.net> wrote: > In article <bjl5c6$jrvbm$1nopsam34476.news.uni-berlin.de>, > davehinznopsamcop.net says... >> >> Have you reported your problem to the NHTSA? Are you planning to? Milt doesn't answer this. >> > I didn't realize it was a big-deal safety issue at that point. I >> > hadn't collected information yet. >> >> And you still haven't. Milt doesn't answer _this_, either. > Stop quibbling, David. You aren't good at it. Milt. Are you going to report this to someone who is in charge of statistics on this sort of thing (who, incidentally, understands statisics a lot better than you have shown yourself to), or are you just going to continue to whine about it? > I think you want to make this personal because you know I'm > right. You're right that you had two blowouts. You're not right that it's criminal, or that it's typical. > I explained earlier what I meant by "criminal." Don't be such a > child: It's boring. Honor my posts. Start using some logic and I'll consider it. > Under US Law, a company that fails to consider a product safety > issue that it knows will put product users at risk of injury has > committed a Criminal act. The question here isn't just what Saab > knew; it's also what Saab has a legal duty to know. I am using > the term appropriately. Go take it up with the feds, or the cops, or someone who can do something about it then, Milt. If it's a criminal thing, then think of the countless lives you may save by doing so. Gosh that would be oh so honorable. Then again, they're likely to tell you you just had bad luck, which of course you wouldn't want to hear (again), but I guess that's a risk you'll have to take in your effort to save us from your tire problems.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
