Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:57:18 GMT From: "SPL" <SPLnopsam.net> Subject: Re: 900 vs 9-3.
My brother has the 98 saab 900. He has had some battery and alternator problems. The 900 did NOT perform as well in car crash ratings as the 9-3. My advice is to go with the 9-3...it may be more money, but it has 1,000 technical improvements and stronger safety ratings(side impact airbags.) I own a 2002 9-3...the last of the model year...and I enjoy my car over my brothers 10 fold! P.S. It has better seats then the 900, and the exterior looks better! "BL" <brianlevernopsamatico.ca> wrote in message news:6vPNb.1406$XZ.226440nopsam20.bellglobal.com... > The NG 900 had several "issues"...particularilly the clutch, idler pully > gears, ventillation system that were rectified with the '98 NG900. There is > not a lot of obvious differences between the '98 and '99. > > BL > > "Robert Murphy" <rtmurphnopsamcity.com> wrote in message > news:bu448i$d874f$1nopsam80884.news.uni-berlin.de... > > In looking for a used Saab I've come across a 98 900 and 99 9-3. Mileage > is > > similar but the price on the 900 is a certainly lower. I was hoping for > > some suggestions as far as quality and reliability issues involving these > > two models. I know a lot will depend on the 2 individual cars but I was > > wondering about any known differences between the two. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Bob > > > > > > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
