Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 22:44:40 -0300 From: Dexter J <lamealameadingdongnospamlamelame.org> Subject: Re: Opinions welcome 1994 900V6 with an automatic
Salutations: On Tue, 11 May 2004 21:24:04 -0400, ma_twain <ma_twainnospamo.com> wrote: > Thanks for all of the advice. The one thing going for the V6 is the > body style - it is a four door hatchback. As for the blind spots, I > will drive it to see if it is any worse than a Camry or Accord. I drove > a Maxima with a manual transmission awhile back. I may have to revisit > it. I did not like the sluggish steering and handling. > > As for the 1992 red box turbo, I can get a black box ECU. This should > reduce the power somewhat. I am curently driving a 1993 900 turbo SPG > with a red box and it certainly has too much power for a beginning > driver. > > I forgot to add option #3 - a 1996 900 Turbo convertible with an > automatic - not a serious consideration. No trunk room, almost zero > visiblity out the back and the front windows frame should be very strong > considering the size. It has large blind spots out the front. I am wondering - is it that hard to find a 94/95 NG900 S model (non-turbo) 2.3 in the DC area - or is a 6 banger a requirement given application? The s model NG900 is identical in every way - except the hoopy engine. -- J Dexter - webmaster - http://www.dexterdyne.org/ all tunes - no cookies no subscription no weather no ads no news no phone in - RealAudio 8+ Required - all the Time Radio Free Dexterdyne Top Tune o'be-do-da-day Bill Monroe - Mule Skinner http://www.dexterdyne.org/888/007.RAM
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
