Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:25:29 -0400 From: Imad Al-Ghouleh <ighoulnospamox.mcgill.ca> Subject: Re: Cost of repair Audi BMW Saab...(crossposting)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010509020206000909000603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit actually. i dont know anymore if all you said was true! But I DO know what you said about the weather is NOT! :) Imad Imad Al-Ghouleh wrote: > all is true except the bad weather BMW! I have a bimmer and live in > Montreal, the land of snow! I have no problems in bad weather (well > very very few problems to be more precise). All you need is a good set > of tires. but nothing beats the quattro in snow, i grant you that! > Imad > JP Roberts wrote: > >>>For me, BMW are too common on the roads. They are not particularly fuel >>>efficient (petrol), >>> >>> >> >>I think it is precisely BMW that produce the most efficient petrol engines >>available, given similar power figures. Turbos could arguably be driven more >>efficiently at low speeds, but then again, this is not so clear an argument >>under normal driving conditions. And everyone knows a nice torquey >>6-cylinder or bigger engine is always preferable to a turbo engine, because >>of the inherent turbo lag and poor low-end performance. The problem with >>most BMWs is they are useless in bad weather and if you want to have fun on >>the dry you may want to spend big bucks on visiting the tyre shop as often >>as the filling station. This is why I am an Audi driver. >> >> >> >> --------------010509020206000909000603 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> actually. i dont know anymore if all you said was true! But I DO know what you said about the weather is NOT! :)<br> Imad<br> <br> Imad Al-Ghouleh wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="midDzWnc.21662$FH5.579379nospam20.bellglobal.com"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;"> <title></title> all is true except the bad weather BMW! I have a bimmer and live in Montreal, the land of snow! I have no problems in bad weather (well very very few problems to be more precise). All you need is a good set of tires. but nothing beats the quattro in snow, i grant you that!<br> Imad<br> JP Roberts wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="midc7orqg$r33$1nospam.ya.com"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">For me, BMW are too common on the roads. They are not particularly fuel efficient (petrol), </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> I think it is precisely BMW that produce the most efficient petrol engines available, given similar power figures. Turbos could arguably be driven more efficiently at low speeds, but then again, this is not so clear an argument under normal driving conditions. And everyone knows a nice torquey 6-cylinder or bigger engine is always preferable to a turbo engine, because of the inherent turbo lag and poor low-end performance. The problem with most BMWs is they are useless in bad weather and if you want to have fun on the dry you may want to spend big bucks on visiting the tyre shop as often as the filling station. This is why I am an Audi driver. </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> </body> </html> --------------010509020206000909000603--
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
