Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:33:06 +0200 From: Zweef∆ <zweefnospamemeel.nl> Subject: Re: Canadian Fuel question: '04 9-5 Arc?
In article <1zr7qyk3rc.fsfnospamrun.rim.net>, vhaagnospamcom says... > > The owner's manual recommends 93 octane fuel, but try finding a > station that offers it here in Southern Ontario: rare as hen's > teeth. > > So -- what's better for the engine? 92 or 94 fuel? I'm willing > to pay the extra five cents a litre if it will be of real > benefit to my car (i.e. better for the longevity and fuel > efficiency of the engine over the long term; "better > performance" is not necessarily a factor for me). > Use 94 if you want to be on the safe side, but 92, 93 or 94 is a very limited bandwidth, so if it runs well on the 92 octane use that, no chance of engine damage here. -- Bezit en wijsheid zijn illusies