Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:47:21 GMT From: John B <rotten_NOSPAM_nospam.org> Subject: Re: '89 900 turbo auto trans
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:37:55 -0800, steven <stevenbrandnospamge.net> wrote: > ANYONE THERE? Should I be more specific? > I think I missed the original post. Seems like all the details are in order. > On 2005-02-19 18:04:18 -0800, steven <stevenbrandnospamge.net> said: > >> just bought this car and it looks great and the engine seems sound >> enough for a car it's age (about 120,000 miles) BUT: Eh, 120k is pretty young for these cars, though maybe not for an automatic transmission in a turbo. >> 1. it doesn't accelerate very well, seeming to stay in low gear for too >> long, and is hesitant when changing. it's great at about 30 or 40 mph >> and picks up speed well, but between 0 and 30 and at 50 it is sluggish. That is typical of the classic 900 automatic transmissions. Not really so great compared to a manual. If you're mechanically inclined and looking for a big project, you could swap in a manual transmission. Theoretically. >> 2. the interior of the car smells strongly of coolant (i think?). Could be a leaky heater control valve, or possibly heater core. Is there coolant dripping on your feet (or the passenger's feet if you're in the UK)? >> 3. there is a squeeling sound when it's cold and raining. Make sure the belts are tight. Otherwise, it could be a problem with the crankshaft pulley (120k miles is a typical lifespan for one). If it is the crank pulley, you'll want to get that fixed. >> 4. it seems to consume a lot of fuel. >> That might be related to the automatic transmission. Otherwise I don't know what to say, other than make sure the spark plugs, oxygen sensor, distributor/rotor, etc. are in good shape. Hope this helps, John
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
