 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:36:57 +0100 From: Grunff <grunffnospam.com> Subject: Re: Why is this newsgroup all technical troubleshooting?
Saab Guy wrote: > I hear you. I know what you're saying, but "better" is subjective. There maybe others that think the new 9-3SS is better than their C900, but then I would just like to say it's different. I actually meant better than its peers. You can argue for a loong time about whether a C900 is 'better' than a 9^3 - I don't think that matters. To me, the real question is: It's clear that a C900 was a much better car than the vast majority of directly comparable cars available during its production run. Can the same be said of a 9^3? > I think the problem is, is that Saab is "replacing" Saabs with other Saabs instead of simply "adding" to a fleet. If Saab kept C900 or NG900s for that matter, or both of them and kept upgrading them then adding the 9-3SS to the fleet, everyone would be happy. > It would be nice to see a 2005 C900, 2005 NG900 along with the 9-3SS and 9-3 SportCombi. Now that would be good! Hmm, interesting idea ;-) -- Grunff
|
|
|
|
|