Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:39:47 GMT From: Johannes <johsnospamkblock2334sizefitter.com> Subject: Re: So, would you say Saabs are reliable?
WitchDr wrote: > > "Tex" <texnospamm101.org> wrote in message > news:k7ednefqSo7P5BffRVn-1Anospamast.com... > > Keep in mind, the newer Saabs have newer technology. And as cool as new > > technology can be, it also is the least tested and consequently is less > > reliable. This goes for any manufacturer stuffing the latest and greatest > > tech gear into their cars. > > "Newer" technology as opposed to GM's...which is still using pushrod V-6's. Reliability has more to do with production and quality control than design. Typically, rust starts at paint and treatment voids. Moisture enters at panel gaps. Improper assembly leads to rattles and wear. This also suggests that there might be good and bad model vintage. I remember that British Leyland cars were particular bad in strike years.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
