Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:55:15 -0400 From: "Valjean" <jvaljeannospamamcharter.net> Subject: Re: 9000CS Tire Help Again!
I can see there's a campaign on here you're part of, and that ways are regularly being found and invented to insist that it's justified. People should feel it's been conducted in a manner both mean-spirited and low, and meant to interfere in the purpose for which boards like this exist. As to the matter of this thread, to recast a question so it's understood (the content is not the same, though hardly been your interest here) is hardly discourteous, and unless you have some interest I don't know of, you're out of line in here. Please don't respond further, it's neither your board nor your place to do that. "Sleeker GT Phwoar" <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1d499487644d5d2398b1c1nospam.individual.net... > In article <25LDe.177$U%6.165nospam.lga>, jvaljeannospamamcharter.net > says... >> Those responses all somehow just dealt with the tire speed rating scheme, >> now didn't they? Is this post of yours insulting or what? >> > No it is not just insulting. > Part of your question was about ratings. > That was answered. > You did not return to the thread at all. > If you had, and thanked people regarding the speed rating feedback you > recieved, and did they have any brand preferences, it would have been > more courteous, than asking a similar question again. > > Also if you had stated which part of this large green ball you > inhabited, you might not have only been recommended a brand, but even a > local tyre chain that has a reputation for fantastic work and service. > > I going to assume that by use of "Tire", and "Interstate", you are in > the continental north american region, or at least originate from that > part. There is life beyond it's borders. Superior cars are made in that > space.* > > *That was intended to be insulting. > -- > Carl Robson > Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz > Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com