Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:01:35 GMT From: "Bill Jackson" <wjacksonnospamesterdotrr.com> Subject: Re: SID - again
if your s is under warranty now, take it in and tell them it's intermittent while it's under warranty. Even if they don't see it, it'll be on record as an issue. that way, if 6-months down the road the pixels never come back, you can refer back to the first time you took it in. Does anyone happen to have the old positngs from this group? There have been numerous SID postings, but our news server here seems to let this stuff drop off the table after a while. "Colum Mylod" <cmylodnospamammed.comREMOVE> wrote in message news:cok5k19p7htp6j1oqd0bjjq4coku90pnbcnospamcom... > On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:42:22 GMT, "Bill Jackson" > <wjacksonnospamesterdotrr.com> wrote: > > ... >>Ive decided that I am going to write a letter to the chariman of General >>Motors, I need some help. Anyone who has had a SID failure can you please >>send me an email at the below address, put "this is not spam" in the title >>please so the spam filter won't delete it. > > Mine after 2+ years is beginning to think of failing. I spotted 3 > pixels off on Saturday but they were right as rain when I restarted > the engine later. > > Serious Q for GB Saabers: could a few calm but strongly worded letters > in vain to Saab UK be used in a small claims court? Typically > companies fold right before the case is heard in case it leads to a > precedent. Might be worthwhile path to follow (mine is still under > initial 3yr warranty so I'm kinda praying for a definite failure > before 15 Dec, or that it stays working 100% but I sympathize with > victims of what is poor design and poorer cust satisfaction). Maybe > there is a USAian way to do this - anyone up for Peoples' Court :-) > > > -- > New anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
