Date: 7 Apr 2007 21:33:30 GMT From: Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospaml.com> Subject: Re: Octane ratings.....what's the truth?
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:21:39 GMT, Walt Kienzle <wkienzlenospam.com> wrote: > "Gary Fritz" <fritzxxxnospamrii.com> wrote in message > news:Xns990AD9F437633fritzfriicomnospam168.3.50... >> So you're saying if you have an Aero (I do, 9-5, 2002) that "generally >> speaking" high-octane fuels ARE a scam? Why? > No, I am saying the opposite because, generally speaking, high octane fuel > is not needed. AERO's would be one of the exceptions. "Not needed" is not the same as "You get no benefit from it".