Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:23:34 GMT
From: still me <>
Subject: Re: Octane ratings.....what's the truth?

On 19 Apr 2007 01:31:31 GMT, Dave Hinz <> wrote: >> Start with Google and "global warming". That should get you rolling. > >Perhaps you missed the "factual and not biased, alarmist handwaving" >part of my request. Dig around, you can find something factual. Oh wait, that might require work on your part and you always want other people to do your work for you. >Don't presume to speak for me. You can't even make your own points >clearly. Don't presume I'd want to speak for you. It would be embarrassing. >Your reading comprehension is as poor as your social skills. Really? I did pretty good in school on those tests they gave us. >> What happened in the 70's is irrelevant. > >And yet, people remember it. Which time were the alarmists wrong? Got >any data to support one or the other? Let me repeat: what happened in the 70's is irrelevant. What is today, is. >> Either go do some reading or just continue to act like an ideologue - >> your choice. > >See what I mean about getting attacked for asking for information? You're not being attacked, you're being highlighted.

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2020 - The Saab Network -
For usage guidelines, see the Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | on Facebook | on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]