Re: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)? - Saab 9-3SS Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 93 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?
Posted by trinerd [Email] (more from trinerd) on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:59:11
In Reply to: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?, trinerd, Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:22:24
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Thanks for all the feedback, guys! I took the TurboX for a spin this weekend and just wasn't blown away. It's the second time I've driven a TurboX (first was a manual SportCombi last year, this was an automatic sedan) and neither test drive really made me want to part with my 2007 Aero. Definitely didn't have the same reaction that made me move from my 2000 9-3 SE to the 2007 a few years back (although it was hard to move on from the 9-3 styling, that's for sure).
Even if I was completely blown away, I think it'd come down to two things: 1) what kind of trade-in I'd get, and 2) the utility of the SC. I'd miss the SC too much (bikes and lots of spare wheels always travel inside the car, no exceptions) and from what the dealer is telling me, initial estimates indicate I'd get much less for my SC than what it would take to get the deal done.
Also drove the new 9-5 while there and must say I was not impressed, but that's a topic for another board.
In totally unrelated news, there's a fully-loaded TurboX sedan available at Martin Saab in Beverly Hills/Santa Monica...
posted by 63.192.8...
Posts in this Thread:
- Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?, trinerd, Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:22:24
- Re: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?, trinerd, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:59:11 <-- Viewing This Message
- Re: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?, Dave Chicago, Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:44:15
- Re: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?, BlueWhite, Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:49:52
- Re: Should I Get a TurboX (to replace my 2007 9-3 Aero)?, Mark Anderson, Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:50:24
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!