[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Any thoughts on this? Posted by Justin VanAbrahams [Email] (#32) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Justin VanAbrahams) on Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:56:50 In Reply to: Re: Any thoughts on this?, Kevin K [Profile/Gallery] , Fri, 9 Nov 2001 21:37:48 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
I think I finally have the TPS thing worked out. LH 2.4 uses a potentiometer just like the AFC expects... I can use an overly complex system of microswitches to replicate the LH 2.2 function. Or, get off my ass and just switch to 2.4.. it isn't difficult.
My desire to use a MAP instead of an AMM is one of simple cost and reliability. The AMM, quite simply sucks. They are inaccurate, they don't account at *all* for turbo heat and intercooler cooling, they break, and they are a substantial obstacle to the intake tract. I'd just assume get rid of mine. If a SAFC can be the translater between two disparate systems, I'd like to go that route.
-Justin
posted by 66.123.95.1...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.