Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 10:16:15 +0000
From: Johannes H Andersen <johsnopsamsizefitterzzzz.com>
Subject: Re: Saab 93 Sports Saloon 2.2 Tid


DervMan wrote: > > "Rawnsley Charles" <charlie> wrote in message > news:3e44ef3e$1_1nopsam.vo.lu... > > Hi, > > > > Thinking of buying a Saab 93 Sports Saloon 2.2 Tid, however, looking at > the > > performance compared to an Audi A4 or a 320d BMW it looks a little on the > > sluggish side. Anyone out there got one and can tell me if it's got any > > poke? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Interesting question! > > I'm guessing that you've looked and compared the 0 - 60 acceleration times? > To be blunt, these mean little other than the "my car's faster than yours" > argument, usually used by Citroen Saxo VTR drivers 'cos Citroen lengthened > the VTR's gearing to hit 60 in second (and thus robbed the car of a decent > response at low speed). > > What's more telling is the way the engine delivers it's performance, the > gearing, the mid-range acceleration, and the power and torque to weight > ratios of the bunch, but even this is only a base point: you need to drive > the cars! > > However. > > The BMW has the highest output, and that 2.0 litre donk is a peach. It's > more powerful than either the A4 TDI 130 and the 9-3, and - of greater > significance - it has more torque. 328 Nm of the stuff. > > The A4 and the 9-3 are closely matched, with the A4 having a small advantage > (130 PS, 284 Nm for the A4, 125 / 278 for the Saab). > > The BMW is the heaviest, the A4 the lightest. And on paper, the BMW is the > quickest. But comparing the BMW and the A4, in a straight line, I found the > A4 felt quicker. Which one would I have taken? Neither, actually, but > that's a long story. I would have been more inclined to take the BMW rather > than the Audi, but I'd not swap the Ka for it. > > I've not driven the current 9-3, and won't until the next colleague wants > something in this class! My Datasheet reckons the 9-3 will be slightly > slower than the other two, but it may not *feel* that way, and the datasheet > cannot take into account gear ratios and suchlike. > > You need to drive all three cars back to back! I'm not much for diesels; my 9000 CSE 2.0 LPT will do over 40 mpg on motorway driving if I don't drive like crazy. Anyway, the first I would look for in a diesel is differences in noise and vibration since this is the main bugbear and where I expect the technology is advancing. I don't quite believe it when people say that this problem has been completely eradicated. I can hear diesel cars clattering when stopping at traffic lights; these are modern diesel cars, not just the London taxis. I often get worried that something has got loose in my engine until I realise that it's caused by a diesel in front of me. I've read comparison tests between the three cars and the 2.2 diesel Saab came last this respect. Johannes

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2020 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]