Date: 20 Apr 2007 21:00:40 GMT
From: Dave Hinz <>
Subject: Re: Octane ratings.....what's the truth?

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:35:45 GMT, still me <> wrote: > On 20 Apr 2007 02:44:14 GMT, Dave Hinz <> wrote: > >>I was hoping for unbiased sources. Obviously you are incapable of >>providing same. > > Wrong conclusion. Once again, I invite you to do your own research. Yawn. I was hoping that you had something factual to back up your rantings. Apparentely you do not. If I wanted algore's crap, that, I could find easy enough. Was looking for actual science, you see, and since you seem to pretend you have same, asked you for it. >>At least you're nearing self-awareness. Let me guess - I've plonked you >>before and you've nym-shifted yet again, right? > > Aside from the fact that "plonking" is a habit of the truly lame, > you're even lamer - because you claim to plonk people and never do. Show me one example, in the last dozen years, of me saying <plonk> to somoene and then responding to posts from the same address. Hint: you can't. >>Riiiiight. So. One last try there sparky. Why should I believe this >>batch of idiots more than the batch of idiots 20 years ago? They both >>seem to have the same basic ideas, but with opposite results. What's >>the real deal, and why? Hint: if you respond with abuse, that weakens >>your credibility. Just so you know. > > Let me try one more time: what people said 20 years ago has no bearing > on the scientific realities today. Continually claiming that it does > really makes you look very foolish. I never "claimed" anything, I'm asking for evidence to show me I should believe this batch of idiots rather than the previous batch. It's obvious you have nothing to add to this conversation.

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2020 - The Saab Network -
For usage guidelines, see the Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | on Facebook | on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]