Re: toe in eats the tires not camber.....Re: springs... - Saab 9-5 Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 95 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: toe in eats the tires not camber.....Re: springs...
Posted by James [Email] (more from James) on Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:45:09
In Reply to: toe in eats the tires not camber.....Re: springs..., saabsince 93b [Profile/Gallery]
, Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:46:19
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
I agree, toe in would do way more damage faster than camber alone...
I started on the upper perch as per your advice (thanks for all the suggestions btw, big help) but the ride height was way too high with the wagon springs (on a sedan) so moved to the lower. Even so I was almost 1/2" over spec but it sagged just a bit below spec (maybe 1/4" iirc). need to measure again.
I could easily raise it again in situ... that's a nice thing about the konis! I'd almost advocate using the lower perch + spacers to get the height right + then if it sags further, one can easily bump it up 2cm later without removing the shock...
fwiw, when I compared the konis dimensions with the original sachs shocks I took off, the lower perch of the konis was identical level to the oem perch on the sachs within a mm or so... (this is a 2004 Arc, may be different on an Aero?)... but if reusing the old springs, the extra 2cm the upper perch buys might be a good thing...
I didn't change the bushings, but didn't notice any obvious problems. I know that doesn't mean there aren't any! But my indy (a Saab specialist) didn't think it was worth doing (I'd get him to do that, I don't have a press). Sounds like the 9-5 can be aligned well enough, even if already sagged, that the tire wear is not a huge problem... in my case, I need it to haul heavy loads (like our older saabs do) without problems... hence the beefier shocks + springs to reduce the sag + alignment *change* under load...
I'm still watching my tires like a hawk though, so we'll see how this all plays out ;-)
(sorry to hijack this thread!)
James...
posted by 216.75.191...
Posts in this Thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!