New Rear Springs - No Difference! - Saab 9-5 Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -

[General | Members | C900 | 9000 | NG900 & OG93 | 93 | 95 | NG95 | 99 | Sonett | Vintage Models | Clubs | Other Cars | FAQs | Gifts | Member Photo Galleries | Member Directory | Classifieds | Manuals | *Buddy Registry | *Mileage Registry | Polls | What's New | Raffle | Photo of the Month | Sponsors]

95 Bulletin Board
1999-2009 [Subscribe to Daily Digest]
(Search Author's Posts: e.g. Keyword:username)*Members Only


[Main 95 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ | Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ] Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
New Rear Springs - No Difference!
Like This Post: - Subscribe to Daily Digest for this Bulletin Board
Posted by RegQ [Email] (more from RegQ) on Sun, 23 May 2010 21:00:00 Share Post by Email
Alert me when someone posts in this thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup

I'd posted back on April 20 that it seemed my 1999 SE V6 showed more sagging of the rear suspension with a modest load than I remembered. I had checked the ride height from the ride height tables (from the WIS I think) at this web site.

http://sites.google.com/site/saabfailed/

For the life of me I cannot find the ride height tables in my own copy of the WIS and the search function of the WIS seems awful to me.

Anyhow, the rear ride height with standard suspension and 16" wheels is supposed to be 605 mm or 23.82" This is measured from the lowest edge of the wheel rim to the edge of the wheel arch of the sheet metal fender at its highest point. When I originally checked my car, it was only 22.63", over an inch lower that this spec. Front was lower too but by less than 1/2.

Based on that I ordered new rear springs. I installed them about 5 days ago. At first the ride height was about 5/8" higher (only) but now that the new springs have been loaded for a time, the ride height has settled to within 1/8" of where it was with the old springs!

I wonder if the table I found is incorrect? With a full tank of gas and nothing else loading the car, it looks perfectly fine visually.

While I was changing the springs, I compared the free height of the old and new and they were almost identical. So it seem only logical that the ride height is essentially unchanged. I hope the new springs might make a difference with a load, but it seems unlikely if they were no higher uncompressed than the old springs.

So... after 11 years and 163,000 km, it seems my original rear springs were not exhausted. Kind of goes against some of the other anecdotal situations I've read on this BB. They are the correct springs as the colour code matches the original.

Go figure,
Reg

posted by 207.161.192...


Posts in this Thread:
Alert me when someone posts in this thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup

No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.

Name: Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
E-Mail: (Optional)
Re-Enter E-Mail: (Confidential & Secure - Not revealed to other users!)
Note: Please check your spam folder for BB responses.

Subject:

Posting rules are simple - No for sale/wanted ads may be posted here - use the site classifieds.
You may not cross-post your message to multiple BBs.
Not permitted: political/religious topics and being disrespectful (personal attacks, insults, etc...).
Site Members do not see any red text, inline ad links, bottom of page anchor ads, box ads, or anti-spam check.

Message: (please no for sale/wanted classifieds - post those in the Saabnet.com Classifieds)
Links are now automatically made active, no need for any special code (or use the Option Link field below) - don't put links in () or end with a '.'
To add inline images to your post, use [img]http://www.domain.com/img.jpg[endimg] (or use the Optional Image Link field below).


Links are now automatically made active, no need for any special code (or use the Option Link field below) - don't put links in () or end with a '.'
To add inline images to your post above, use [img]http://www.domain.com/img.jpg[endimg] (or use the Optional Image Link field below).

Optional Link: (e.g. http://www.saabnet.com/)
Link Title: (Optional)
Optional Photo/Image Link: (e.g. http://www.saabnet.com/img.jpg)
Photo/Image to Upload: (Please be patient while file uploads)





StateOfNine.com
SaabClub.com
Jak Stoll Performance
M Car Covers
Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]

Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)

This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right. Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY. Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages. This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP - Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot



Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all the Site Membership Benefits!