[Main C900 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ | Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ] Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos mitsu vs garret Like This Post: - Subscribe to Daily Digest for this Bulletin Board Posted by vvack0matic [Email] (#1443) [Profile/Gallery] (more from vvack0matic) on Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:26:45 In Reply to: VVack, you need to understand..., Chaz, Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:02:33 Alert me when someone posts in this thread: Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup

just a mazing i was just going to post how the mitsu gets the 0 to 60 run over the garret from the spool but the garret is the one that gets 60 to 120, you are so right it is the driver and where the car is most used,
i guess the over all performance that is said about the mitsu, is for stop light to stop light drivers, however top end or hwy drivers sound like the garret takes the cake,
for me i guess it seems i stay with garret, i love the top end boost to much, and im on the hwy 75% of the time,
now back to the motor to finish the lower radiator hose,
just a thought:
after reading on what the last garret turbo was to be installed
i find spg had a change in hp in 89-90
it went from 160 hp to 175 hp
the 160 hp motor had the garret tbo382
the 175 hp motor had the tbo383
why would they have a differnt garret for the two motors
did garret upgrade their turbo in the 90s,
any info on this garret turbo and the hook up to exhaust bolt pattern would be great, am i to think that all the differnt garret turbos fitted to the 2.0L motor from 84-90/91-93 have the same bolt pattern
if so that would make things alot easy-er
thanks for the thoughts

posted by 67.142.13...

• water cooled to oil cooled turbo, vvack0matic , Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:35:56
  • All you need to do is securely plug the water lines..., Chaz, Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:22:18
    • turbo compatibility, vvack0matic , Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:55:28
      • The mitsu is water cooled n/m, Chaz, Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:19:25
      • No 2.3l spg's!!!!! (unless i'm confused) n/m, nicknick , Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:42:49
        • 2.3l ? nope, and I am confused [:} n/m, dSPG89, Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:22:04
          • in searching for turbos, vvack0matic , Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:12:34
            • VVack, you need to understand..., Chaz, Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:02:33
              • mitsu vs garret, vvack0matic , Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:26:45 <-- Viewing This Message
    • Re: water vs oil cooled, kenS , Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:35:24
      • I second that!, EW, Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:17:04
        • Third that, Got 285K on mine, S-Works, Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:32:20

No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.

• Prev by Date: Seat position/angle, not hatch size, Greg Abbott, Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:25:04
• Next by Date: longest between oil change - unintentional, jw, Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:31:38
• Main C900 Bulletin Board

StateOfNine.com

SaabClub.com

Jak Stoll Performance

M Car Covers

Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]

Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)