You sure about the 'less weight' part? - Saab 9000 Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14 |
5/23: SOC Day Pass Winners Announceed
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 9000 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
You sure about the 'less weight' part?
Posted by JEM (more from JEM) on Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:12:32
In Reply to: Re: why was the V6 such a bad engine?, Ari [Profile/Gallery]
, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:56:44
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
The Saab four isn't light, the 54-degree V6 is quite compact, and by the time you add the weight of a turbocharger, intercooler, and so forth I'd bet there's not any significant difference.
For everyone else's benefit: it's the same basic engine used in a bunch of Euro Opels and Vauxhalls, the Cadillac Catera and (in its later 3.2 form) the CTS, the Saturn L-series and the first couple years of VUE. The cam belt tensioner changed along the way, Cateras have had trouble on this front too (whatever GM tells you, even with the new tensioner don't run the belt past 60K miles.)
posted by 209.172.1...
Posts in this Thread:
- why was the V6 such a bad engine?, rob 94 cse, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:52:44
- For us DIY types, availability...., David Ingram, Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:13:23
- Re: why was the V6 such a bad engine?, cse93turbo, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:00:54
- Re: why was the V6 such a bad engine?, Ari , Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:56:44
- Re: why was the V6 such a bad engine?, Bill Davies, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:24:36
- Don't agree with the Starting Premise!, Sterling98, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:04:27
- Yeah, it was the V-6 in the GM900 that sucked. nm, Rafe, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:21:04
- Same experience, Aaron Govatos, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:19:16
- Re: Don't agree with the Starting Premise!, rob 94 cse, Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:07:01
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!